2003 Honda S2000R --- 340 hp.

**randomwalk101** · August 9th, 2002, 01:32 AM

Want one? Only $53K.
http://www.mcclatchie.com/reviews/S2000R.html

**Holden** · August 9th, 2002, 02:03 AM

Bullshit.

**CROM** · August 9th, 2002, 01:27 PM

I'll take a Z06.

**The LS Avenger** · August 9th, 2002, 01:36 PM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Holden:
Bullshit.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

What aspect are you referring to ? The pricetag ( a bit high, granted) or the tech info ?

**Holden** · August 9th, 2002, 02:25 PM

This website was recently de-bunked on an autocross listserver. I didn't verify it, but it was stated that many of technical stats are exactly double the real S2000 stats.

Either way, I still call bullshit. This car is not real.

**Jay Lee** · August 9th, 2002, 04:13 PM

I agree... I can't see Honda developing an I-6 from scratch when they already have some nice V-6 designs that can be further evolved...

**217gsr** · August 9th, 2002, 04:51 PM

Honda would never develope a car for ~50k that could top the performance of the NSX. It just doesn't fit into their pricing scheme.

**CKim** · August 9th, 2002, 05:04 PM

Yup... and electronically assisted rev-matching and electrically assisted synchros just don't sound all that realistic.

**nexusone** · August 9th, 2002, 06:54 PM

Look, as director of business development for S2000 International, I know a thing or two about the stook. That review is not real. It was written by one of our users as www.s2ki.com as a writing project/joke.

Pay it no heed.